Literature: 5
When I was reading the paper I could tell that the author fully understood the book of Romeo and Juliet. She analyzed Romeo's character very well. She went into full detail about everything she interpreted about the character while reading a performing.
Performance: 9
When I was reading the paper I felt like there was more literature than performance because she was going very deep about the character of Romeo. It just felt like there was more about the character and less about her actual performance. However, when the author explained her performance it was well described and I could imagine what it would look like on stage.
Language: 5
This paper had a very good use of language. Not only was there good language but it was always consistent throughout the paper.
Samantha Weed Paper:
Literature: 5
When I was reading the paper I knew that the author had a good grasp of the book. She was able to describe the transformation of Juliet very well.
Performance: 10
The performance was described very well no she wwas able to describe the transformation of Juliet throughout the paper.
Language: 5
There was a lot of strong language present in the paper.
Literature: 5
When I was reading the paper I knew that the author had a good grasp of the book. She was able to describe the transformation of Juliet very well.
Performance: 10
The performance was described very well no she wwas able to describe the transformation of Juliet throughout the paper.
Language: 5
There was a lot of strong language present in the paper.
No comments:
Post a Comment